Towards a Holistic View of Nature: A New Paradigm for 21st Century Interdisciplinary Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/na3mfj31Keywords:
Holistic Science, Interdisciplinary Research, Complex Systems, Systems Biology, Earth System Science, Artificial Intelligence in Science, Scientific Paradigm ShiftAbstract
The 20th century scientific landscape was largely defined by reductionism, achieving monumental success by breaking down complex systems into their constituent parts. However, the most pressing challenges of the 21st century-from climate change and pandemics to the mysteries of consciousness and the origin of the universe-are inherently complex, multi-scale, and interconnected. This paper argues that a paradigm shift towards a holistic, integrative approach to scientific inquiry is not merely beneficial but essential. We articulate a new framework for "Holistic Natural Science," which moves beyond traditional disciplinary silos to embrace convergence. This framework is characterized by the seamless integration of knowledge across physics, chemistry, biology, earth sciences, and engineering, powered by advanced computational modeling, artificial intelligence (AI), and high-throughput instrumentation. We explore the philosophical underpinnings of this shift, present case studies in systems biology, earth system science, and materials genomics that exemplify its power, and discuss the enabling role of AI and machine learning in deciphering complex systems. Furthermore, we address the significant sociological and institutional barriers-such as departmental structures, funding mechanisms, and academic reward systems-that hinder this transition. The article concludes by proposing concrete strategies for fostering a holistic research ecosystem, including the creation of cross-disciplinary institutes, development of new educational curricula, and the implementation of data standards that facilitate interoperability. Embracing this holistic paradigm is imperative for generating the profound, systemic understanding required to navigate the complexities of our world and drive sustainable innovation.
References
[1]Karr, J. R., Sanghvi, J. C., Macklin, D. N., Gutschow, M. V., Jacobs, J. M., Bolival, B., ... & Covert, M. W. (2012). A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell, *150*(2), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044
[2]Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., ... & Hassabis, D. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, *596*(7873), 583-589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
[3]Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., ... & Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, *3*(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
[4]Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., ... & Taylor, W. W. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, *317*(5844), 1513-1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004
[5]de Pablo, J. J., Jackson, N. E., Webb, M. A., Chen, L. Q., Moore, J. E., Morgan, D., ... & Governors, I. (2019). New frontiers for the materials genome initiative. npj Computational Materials, *5*(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0173-4
[6]Brovkin, V., Boysen, L., Arora, V. K., Boisier, J. P., Cadule, P., Chini, L., ... & Winkler, A. (2013). Effect of anthropogenic land-use and land-cover changes on climate and land carbon storage in CMIP5 projections for the twenty-first century. Journal of Climate, *26*(18), 6859-6881. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00623.1
[7]Spangler, S., Wilkins, A. D., Bachman, B. J., Nagarajan, M., Dayaram, T., Haas, P., ... & Regenbogen, S. (2014). Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1877-1886). https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623667
[8]Kitano, H. (2002). Systems biology: a brief overview. Science, *295*(5560), 1662-1664. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069492
[9]Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., ... & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, *347*(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
[10]Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001
[11]National Research Council. (2014). Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18722
[12]Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, *566*(7743), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1
[13]Ahn, A. C., Tewari, M., Poon, C. S., & Phillips, R. S. (2006). The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative? PLoS Medicine, *3*(6), e208. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030208
[14]Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S., TajMazinani, M., & Mac Feely, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) or intelligence augmentation (IA): what is the future? AI, *1*(2), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ryan Patrick Murphy (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
